Modern Methods of Detecting and Eradicating Known and Unknown Viruses, Hacking and IT E-Book Dump Release
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
Modern Methods of Detecting and
Eradicating Known and Unknown
Viruses
Dmitry Mostovoy
5th international conference Virus Bulletin - 95
September 1995
Abstract
Viruses are growing in number from day to day, so it is obvious that soon anti-
virus programs like NAV or MSAV will not be quite efficacious. Therefore, we
started designing a program that would annihilate not individual infectors, but
viruses in general, regardless of whether a virus is known or not, or whether it is
old or new.
The first outcome of our efforts in this direction, ADinf (Advanced
Diskinfoscope), is a forecasting center which alerts the user in advance with great
reliability about the intrusion of viruses, even HITHERTO unknown infectors. As
distinct from all other data integrity checkers, ADinf inspects a disk by scanning
the sectors one by one via direct addressing of BIOS without the assistance of the
operating system and takes under check all vital parts of hard disk. To evade such a
detection tactics is almost impossible.
ADinf alerts the user in time about virus intrusion and restores infected boot
sectors. How to restore the infected files automatically? Our next step was to
produce a curing companion to ADinf. The new tool, ADinf Cure Module, deploys
a novel strategy. Paradoxically, ninety seven percents of the viruses in our
collection fall under few standard groups by the types of infection methods. New
viruses are as a rule designed on one of these common infection principles, and
therefore ADinf Cure Module will be about 97% efficient in its performance also
in the future.
ADinf and ADinf Cure Module are parts of DialogueScience anti-virus kit - the
most popular anti-virus in Russia.
Integrity Checking
The basic classes of anti-virus programs are well known. They are
scanners/removers, monitors, and vaccines. I would like to discuss the
development of programs to which, in my opinion, anti-virus designer pay
undeservedly little attention. This class of anti-virus programs is known as
``integrity checkers'', though the name does not fully characterize the program's
policy which we describe below. This is the only class of purely software means of
anti-virus protection, which permits the detection of known and unknown viruses
with reliability approaching 100% and eradication up to 97% file infectors, even
new hitherto unknown viruses.
The operation of integrity checkers is based on a simple fact: even though it is
impossible to know all information about potentially infinite number of viruses, it
is quite possible to store a finite volume of information about each logical drive in
the disk and to detect virus infection from the changes taken place in files and
system areas of the disk. As already mentioned, the name "integrity checker'' does
not fully reflect the essence of these programs. Infection techniques is not restricted
to a simple modification of the program code. Other paths for infection either
already exist or are also possible; for example, companion viruses [1]. A disk can
be corrupted by restructuring the directory tree, say, by renaming the directories
and creating new directories, and by other such manipulations. Consequently, to
provide reliable protection integrity checkers must take care of far more number of
parameters that the mere changes in the size and CRC of files as is done by most
programs of this class. Thus, master boot record (MBR) and boot sectors of logical
drives, a list of bad clusters, directory tree structure, free memory size, CRC of Int
13h handler in BIOS and even the Hard Disk Parameter Tables, all must be under
the control of integrity checkers. Changes in the size and CRC of files, creation of
new files and directories and removal of old files and directories are obviously
objects for strict control. A designer of integrity checker must be one step ahead of
virus designers and block every possible loophole for parasite intrusion.
Despite the large amount of controlled information, an integrity checker must
nonetheless be user-friendly, simple in usage, and quick in checking disks. It must
at the same time be user-customizable as regards the levels of messages displayed
on the changes occurred in the disk and be capable of conducting a preliminary
analysis of the changes, particularly the suspicious modifications such as
•
changes in size and CRC of files without any change in datestamp,
•
illegal values of hours, minutes or seconds in the datestamp of infected
files (for example, 62 seconds),
•
year greater than the current year (certain viruses mark infected files by
increasing the year of creation by 100 years, which cannot be detected
visually because ``dir'' command only displays the last two figures of the
year,
•
any changes in files specified in the ``stable'' list,
•
change in master boot record or boot sector,
•
appearance of new bad clusters on the disk and others.
Let us now discuss the main problems faced by a designers of ``integrity
checkers''. First, this is the dodging ability of viruses based on stealth-mechanism.
Integrity checkers that rely on operating system tools in their scanning mission are
absolutely helpless against this class of viruses. They have stimulated the
development of an integrity checker that checks disks by reading the sectors via
direct addressing through BIOS. Stealth viruses cannot hide the changes in an
infected file size; on the contrary, under such a scanning technique the stealth-
mechanism betrays the presence of known and hitherto unknown stealth viruses
through the discrepancy between the information given out by DOS and the
information obtained by reading via BIOS. Such algorithms have been created and
successfully detect the appearance of stealth-viruses.
Scanning a disk by reading the sectors by direct addressing of BIOS has one
more important merit which is often overlooked. If a computer is infected by a so-
called ``fast infector'' [1], i.e., a virus that infects files not only when they are
started, but also when they opened, such an integrity checker will not spread the
infection to all files in the disk, because it does not at all address the operating
system for reading a disk via sectors and uses an independent file opening system,
and the viruses does not get any control.
Finally, an integrity checker utilizing direct reading of sectors is twice faster in
checking a disk than any other program than relies on the operating system tools,
because a disk scan algorithm can be created that reads each sector only once and
optimizes the head movements.
Disk handling via BIOS has its own hurdles. The foremost problem is the
compatibility with innumerable number of diverse hardware and software,
including disk compactors (Stacker, DoubleSpace), specialized drivers for
accessing large disks (Disk Manager), SCSI disk drivers etc. Furthermore, there are
many MS-DOS compatible operating systems that have imperceptible but quite
important features in partitioning logical drives. Integrity checkers must pay due
attention to these fine factors.
Virus Removal Techniques
Modern integrity checkers are useful not only in detecting infection, but are also
capable of removing viruses immediately with the help of the information they
retrieve from an uninfected machine at the time of installation. An integrity
checkers can kill known viruses as well as the viruses which were unknown at the
time of creation of the integrity checker.
How this is done? Obvious are the methods for removing viruses from the
master boot record and boot sectors. Integrity checker stores images of uninfected
boot sectors in its tables and in case of damage can instantly restore them. The only
restriction is the restoration must also be effected via direct addressing of BIOS
and after restoration the system must be rebooted immediately in order to prevent
the active virus from reinjecting infection while accessing the disk via INT 13h.
Removal of file viruses is based on a surprising fact, namely, despite the vast
number of diverse viruses, there are only a few techniques by which a virus is
injected into a file. Here we only briefly outline the file restoration strategy. Figure
1 shows a schematic diagram of a usual EXE file.
For each file integrity checker keeps a header (area 1), relocation table (area 2)
and the code at the entry point (area 4). Strings (area 3 and area 5) are vital because
they are the keys to identifying the mutual locations of various areas in an infected
file when a virus writes its tail, not at the file end, but at the file beginning or in the
file body (after the relocation table or at the entry point). In an infected file, after
determining the area that coincides with the imaged areas in the table, the
displacement of a block (for example, the block for area 3 begins at the end of area
2 and ends at the beginning of the area 4) can be identified by string 3 position and
thus moved back to its original location.
+---------------------------+
| EXE-header | 1
+---------------------------|
| Relocation table | 2
+---------------------------|
| Code | 3
| |
| Entry point ------->| 4
| |
| | 5
+---------------------------|
| Debug information or | 6
| overlays |
+---------------------------+
Fig.1
Image of area 6 takes about 3-4 Kb and is essential in recovering a file
corrupted by viruses which damage the debug information and overlays in the
course of defective infection.
Thus, a file is recovered by reinstating its original status overwriting the image
of its structure stored in integrity checker tables on an infected file. Consequently,
a knowledge as to which virus infected the file is not mandatory.
Tables containing information necessary for recovering files take about 200-450
Kb for one logical drive. The table size can be cut down to 90 Kb, if a user decides
not to save the relocation information and this will not have any perceptible
influence on the quality of recovery in most of the cases.
Conclusion
Integrity checkers undoubtedly do not provide a panacea against computer
viruses. Unfortunately, there is no such panacea, nor can there be one. But they are
quite reliable protection utilities which must be used jointly with other classes of
anti-virus tools. The highlights of integrity checkers described above are all
implemented in ADinf program, the most popular itegrity checker in Russia. It also
is known in Germany where it is distributed on CD-ROM as a component of the
DialogueScience Anti-Virus Kit. It checks a disk by reading its sectors one by one
directly addressing BIOS, easily traps active stealth viruses by comparing the
information obtained through BIOS and DOS. It instantly restores up to 97% of
files corrupted by known and unknown viruses.
References
1.
Proc. 2nd Int. Virus Bulletin Conf., September 1992, pp.
131-141.
2. Mostovoy D. Yu., A Method of Detecting and Eradicating Known and
Unknown Viruses, IFIP Transactions, A-43, Security&Control of Information
Technology i Society, February, 1994, pp. 109-111.
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]